Federal judge: NSA phone surveillance legal

A federal judge ruled on Friday that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' telephone and Internet records is lawful and a critical component of the country's effort to combat the threat of terrorism.

In his 54-page opinion, U.S. District Judge William Pauley said the sweeping program "represents the government's counter-punch" to eliminate al-Qaeda's terror network by connecting fragmented and fleeting communications.

"There is no evidence that the Government has used any of the bulk telephony metadata it collected for any purpose other than investigating and disrupting terrorist attacks," he wrote.

The judge further maintained that the program, which sucks up vast amounts of data, is subject to executive and congressional oversight as well as monitoring by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

In issuing the ruling, Pauley dismissed a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU did not immediately respond to a message for comment.

"We are pleased with the decision," Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr said.

The ACLU sued earlier this year after former NSA analyst Edward Snowden leaked details of the secret programs that critics say violate privacy rights. The NSA-run programs pick up millions of telephone and Internet records that are routed through American networks each day.

In hearings before Pauley last month in New York, an ACLU lawyer had argued that the government's interpretation of its authority under the Patriot Act was so broad that it could justify the mass collection of financial, health and even library records of innocent Americans without their knowledge. A government lawyer had countered that counterterrorism investigators wouldn't find most personal information useful.

The judge acknowledged that the data collection system is far-reaching, and "vacuums up information about virtually every telephone call, to, from, or within the United States.

"This blu! nt tool only works because it collects everything," the judge wrote. "Such a program if unchecked, imperils the civil liberties of the every citizen."

10 Best Blue Chip Stocks For 2014

While acknowledging this "natural tension" between protecting the nation and preserving civil liberty, Pauley said the system's ability to sweep up huge quanities of data was "by design" and could have helped investigators connect the dots before the Sept. 11 terrorists attacks

"The government learned from its mistake and adapted to confront a new enemy: a terror network capable of orchestrating attacks across the world. It launched a number of counter-measures, including a bulk telephony metadata collection program — a wide net that could find and isolate gossamer contacts among suspected terrorists in an ocean of seemingly disconnected data," he said.

He also found that the right to be free from search and seizures "is fundamental, but not absolute."

"Every day, people voluntarily surrender personal and seemingly-private information to transnational corporations, which exploit that data for profit," Pauley wrote in . Few think twice about it, even though it is far more intrusive than bulk telephony metadata collection.

Pauley's decision contrasts with a ruling earlier this month by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, who granted a preliminary injunction against the collecting of phone records of two men who had challenged the program. The Washington jurist said the program likely violates the U.S. Constitution's ban on unreasonable search.

Contributing: Associated Press